- SMEs are the backbone of supply chains and a major emissions source, but lack the capital, data, and tools to withstand shocks and decarbonize.
- Most SMEs say sustainability matters, yet few have formal reporting or access green finance, keeping upgrades like digitization and energy efficiency underfunded.
- The article argues traditional supply-chain finance is too short-term and fragmented to drive systemic transformation across supplier networks.
- Programmatic, portfolio-style supply-chain finance could pool cohorts of suppliers to de-risk investment and attract larger capital, but depends on better data, coordination, and risk-sharing.
Read More
The recent World Economic Forum piece proposes a shift toward programmatic supply-chain finance, moving away from reactive, individual-firm instruments toward investments across cohorts of interconnected suppliers to build systemic resilience, productivity, and sustainability. This approach aligns with trends documented in SME surveys, which show surging ambition on sustainability but persisting obstacles to execution—including lack of reporting capacity, high upfront costs, and limited access to tailored capital.
My investigation across multiple sources corroborates these themes and adds further granularity on both the opportunity and the barriers.
SME sustainability ambition is high but under‐capitalized. In the U.S., 71% of SMEs say sustainability is central or important, yet only 4–8% succeed in accessing green finance or improving reporting infrastructure. Globally, while 86% of SMEs state that sustainability matters and many see it as a business opportunity (38%) or are acting (60%), fewer than half identify policy barriers and finance costs as primary constraints—but only one in ten or so have formal systems to track and report on emissions or environmental impact.
Sustainability and capability upgrades require longer-term, coordinated investment. Traditional SCF instruments do help with working capital but generally do not fund the capital expenditures (CapEx) or capability building—for example, upgrading to energy-efficient machinery, digitization, process innovation, or workforce training. These upgrades are necessary for resilience in the face of climate extremes, geopolitical risk, supply shocks, and regulatory/societal pressure.
Programmatic finance models can help scale and de-risk investment—but must bridge key gaps. Portfolio approaches aggregate cohorts of SMEs, align investment roadmaps, benchmark progress, and offer diversified risk profiles that may attract institutional or blended capital. In the ICC/Sage Stocktake, SMEs that use AI or digital tools are significantly more likely to have formal reporting systems and to apply for green finance, helping address info asymmetries. Yet barriers remain: reporting complexity, data availability, high costs, regulatory uncertainty, and insufficient product diversity tailored to smaller players hinder widespread adoption.
Strategic implications include:
- Financial institutions need to re-design green finance products aimed at portfolios/cohorts—not just individual firms—to enable scale and reduce risk.
- Governments and regulators should streamline reporting requirements for SMEs, making them proportionate, standardized, and affordable, supporting both transparency and access to finance.
- Technology providers (digital accounting, carbon tracking, AI credit scoring) have an opening to deliver systems that unlock finance opportunities by feeding reliable data into finance decisions.
- Sector OEMs and lead firms can play anchoring roles by coordinating supplier cohorts, aligning standards, and helping build shared infrastructure.
Open questions that need further investigation include:
- How to design incentive structures (grants, tax credits, regulatory credit) that align with financing models and encourage long-term investment rather than short-term fixes.
- How to ensure risk-sharing arrangements are fair and effective across cohorts—how to deal with weakest links without undermining the portfolio.
- What the measurable return-on-investment is—in terms of emissions reduction, productivity, reliability, resiliency—to attract institutional capital.
- How to adapt models to low- and middle-income countries, where data, credit histories, and digital infrastructure are less mature.
Supporting Notes
- SMEs represent about 90% of businesses and more than 50% of employment worldwide, yet often lack capital, infrastructure or visibility to handle systemic supply-chain shocks.
- SMEs make up 40–60% of business-sector greenhouse-gas emissions globally, meaning their decarbonization is critical to meeting Paris targets.
- Only 2.8% of SMEs have applied for green finance in the past year, and fewer than 10% have mature formal reporting.
- SMEs using AI-powered accounting or carbon-tracking tools are about 1.6–2.4 times more likely to both report formally and successfully seek green finance.
- Traditional SCF tools like invoice factoring or working-capital loans fail to support strategic transformation—such as capacity expansion, digitization and energy efficiency.
- In Australia, SME loans account for around half of total business credit; yet many SMEs report that lender requirements are too strict, interest rate and cost burdens are high and processing is slow.
- Global finance gap for SMEs in climate/sustainability is estimated at US$789 billion.