- The U.S. captured Venezuela’s President Nicolás Maduro in early January 2026 and moved to control and market Venezuelan oil, including selling up to ~50 million barrels of previously sanctioned crude.
- Gold and silver jumped on safe-haven demand (gold ~2–3%, silver ~4–8%), while WTI and Brent rose only modestly (~1–2%) given Venezuela’s small share of global supply and a well-supplied market.
- U.S. energy majors and oilfield service stocks rallied on reconstruction expectations, but boosting Venezuela’s output is likely slow and capital-intensive amid damaged infrastructure and political risk.
- The intervention drew widespread international-law criticism and raised broader sovereign-risk and precedent concerns for geopolitics and energy markets.
Read More
In early January 2026, the United States conducted military operations in Venezuela that led to the capture of President Nicolás Maduro and his wife. The U.S. also asserted control over Venezuela’s oil sector, including the sale of ~50 million barrels of previously sanctioned crude, signaling a direct intervention in how Venezuelan oil is produced, distributed, and marketed. This is a major escalation in U.S. policy, shifting from sanctions and blockades to actual operational control.
Financial markets responded swiftly. Gold and silver—traditional safe havens—jumped in price: gold climbed ~2–3%, silver ~4–8%, reflecting risk-off sentiment. Investors appear to be hedging against political uncertainty, especially given that Venezuela holds vast reserves of oil and precious metals, such as ~161 metric tonnes of gold worth ~$22 billion, which adds a layer of macro-commodity risk.
Oil prices saw more muted reactions. U.S. crude (WTI) rose by about 1–2%, as did Brent, but the gains were tempered. Two reasons stand out: first, Venezuela’s current production, at ~1.1 million barrels per day, constitutes only about 1% of global supply; second, global crude markets remain saturated, and recent IEA forecasts point to possible supply gluts despite OPEC+ cuts. Thus, even under U.S. control, any increase in Venezuelan output will be gradual due to infrastructure decay, sanctions, and investment barriers.
For U.S. companies, there is near-term profit opportunity via participation in Venezuelan energy sector reconstruction. Chevron, ExxonMobil, and oilfield services firms such as SLB and Halliburton saw strong stock gains. However, risks are high: legal ambiguity, political backlash, operational challenge, and uncertain return periods.
Strategically, this operation raises serious questions about international law and precedent. Most Latin American governments condemned the U.S. intervention as a breach of sovereignty; legal scholars argue it violated Article 2(4) of the UN Charter and lacks justification in self-defense or UN Security Council authorization. How the U.S. navigates legitimacy, diplomatic fallout, and multilateral relationships will shape future geopolitical norms.
Supporting Notes
- On January 5, 2026, after the capture of Maduro, gold rose ~2.6% to about $4,460/oz and silver jumped ~4.4% to nearly $77/oz.
- U.S. crude (WTI) and Brent each rose approximately 1.7% to $58.32 and $61.76 per barrel, respectively, following the raid.
- Venezuela’s oil production is approximately 1.1 million barrels per day, making it a small (~1%) part of global supply.
- The U.S. plans to sell up to 50 million barrels of Venezuelan crude that had been blocked by sanctions.
- 152 metric tonnes of gold reserves in South America, with Venezuela holding the region’s largest share (approx. 161 metric tonnes worth ~$22 billion).
- Key firms benefitting included Chevron (+5.1%), ExxonMobil (+2.2%), SLB (+8.9%), Haliburton (+7.8%), and Baker Hughes (+4%) as markets anticipated reconstruction activity.
- Legal reactions: Dozens of countries and UN experts condemned the U.S. raid; some called it a violation of international law and a dangerous precedent.