Trump’s 10% Credit-Card APR Cap Could Hit Bank Profits and Consumer Credit Access

  • Trump proposed a one-year 10% cap on credit-card APRs starting Jan. 20, 2026, far below today’s ~21% average.
  • Banks say the cap would gut card profits, force tighter underwriting, and reduce access for subprime borrowers.
  • Card-focused stocks sold off on the threat to earnings, though many analysts doubt Congress will enact the plan and key mechanics remain unclear.
  • Some fintech and personal-loan lenders see a chance to fill any credit gap if traditional issuers pull back.
Read More

President Trump’s proposal to cap credit-card interest rates at 10% for one year—announced via Truth Social—represents both a political gambit in an election year and a direct threat to one of the most profitable segments of the U.S. financial system. Average credit-card APRs in late 2025 stood at about 20.97%, making the proposed ceiling a drop of roughly half that margin. Terminology such as “in violation of the law” if issuers fail to comply and a start date of January 20 give the move symbolic power, though actual enforcement would require legislative action.

Banks have sounded alarm: JPMorgan CFO Jeremy Barnum warned the cap would “reduce access to credit” and force banks to “significantly change” their business model, especially affecting subprime and near-prime borrowers. Bank executives also stressed that while affordability is a pressing issue, a rate cap would accomplish the opposite effects: worsening credit availability, higher costs from alternate financial products, and potential economic slowdown stemming from weaker consumer spending.

The markets responded with swift repricing of risk: large issuers and cards networks suffered stock losses—Capital One down ~6.4%, American Express ~4.3%, Visa/Mastercard also under pressure—with analysts projecting “billions in profits” to be erased should the cap be enacted. However, many see the risk as a policy overhang rather than a guaranteed outcome: the proposal’s legislative prospects are dim in the current Congress, and lack of implementation details (regulatory agency authority, workaround via fees or underwriting) means much is unresolved.

Strategic implications for different players diverge. Fintechs and personal-loan providers like SoFi see opportunity if credit-card issuance declines, but even they face risks relating to underwriting discipline and regulatory backlash. For banks, exposure to subprime portfolios will likely become a drag, prompting product redesigns, increased use of fees (where allowed), and a tightening of credit criteria. Card networks could lose revenue via both rate caps and proposed “swipe fee” reforms (e.g. the Credit Card Competition Act).

Open questions remain: will Congress even act? What is the constitutional/regulatory authority to impose the cap? How will banks adjust metrics like underwriting, fees, and risk weights? What are the macroeconomic consequences of reduced consumer credit in a economy where spending counts for ~70% of GDP? And what precedents or state-level experiences should inform this? Answering these will shape whether this is a short-term policy noise or a lasting turn in financial regulation.

Supporting Notes
  • Trump proposed a one-year 10% cap on credit-card interest rates, effective January 20, 2026.
  • Average credit-card interest rates were about 20.97% in November 2025.
  • Bank of America posted $7.6 billion profit in Q4 2025 vs $6.8 billion a year earlier; Wells Fargo earned $5.36 billion in Q4 vs $5.08 billion in 2024.
  • Credit card balances at Bank of America rose about 3% year-over-year to $103 billion; debit and credit spending rose ~6%. Delinquencies and charge-offs remained stable.
  • Capital One shares plunged 6.4%, American Express fell about 4.3%, JPMorgan dropped 1.4%, with wider financial sector declines on implementation fears.
  • Estimated U.S. credit card debt is $1.23 trillion; interest rates averaging ~19.65%–21.5%.
  • Banks warn the cap could cause reduced credit access, higher costs via fees or credit-denial, and push borrowers toward more expensive, unregulated lending.
  • SoFi CEO Anthony Noto claims personal loans providers could benefit, stepping in to serve consumers priced out of credit card markets.
  • Analysts and banking trade groups deem legislative risk “low to moderate”; many regard the measure as unlikely to pass Congress in its current form.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search
Filters
Clear All
Quick Links
Scroll to Top