- Trump has revived a push for U.S. control of Greenland, citing Arctic security, strategic geography, minerals, and plans like the “Golden Dome” missile defense.
- Denmark and Greenland reject any sovereignty transfer as illegal and unacceptable, with Greenland’s leaders saying the island is “not for sale” and aligned with Denmark, NATO, and the EU.
- Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio will meet Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen and Greenlandic Foreign Minister Vivian Motzfeldt in Washington to manage the standoff and discuss cooperation short of ownership.
- The dispute raises risks for NATO cohesion and Arctic power politics, with questions over U.S. demands on bases and resources, Greenlandic public opposition, and Russia/China’s roles.
Read More
The latest diplomatic escalation unfolds from President Trump’s renewed assertion that Greenland must become U.S.-controlled, motivated by perceived threats from China and Russia in the Arctic, and interest in Greenland’s minerals and geographic position for defense systems like “Golden Dome.” While Trump speaks of options including military force, Denmark and Greenland have pushed back hard. Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen states decisively: “We choose Denmark … NATO … the EU,” emphasizing that transfer of sovereignty is off the table.
Denmark, for its part, under Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen, has affirmed close alliance yet rejected pressure, criticizing U.S. tone and method. Rasmussen and other Danish officials insist that negotiations, if any, be rooted in respect, international law, and sovereignty. Greenlandic foreign minister Vivian Motzfeldt supports pragmatic cooperation but opposes any suggestion of U.S. ownership.
The imminent meeting in Washington, hosted by Vice President Vance and including state-level officials from all sides, seeks to channel this standoff into structured diplomacy. Attendance by Vance—who has previously accused Denmark of under-investing in Greenland’s security—is particularly inflammatory given his prior rhetoric. The U.S. may seek enhanced military presence, base expansions, access to mineral wealth or resource extraction rights, but must weigh alliance costs.
Strategic implications are multifaceted. First, U.S. push risks undermining NATO cohesion—member states, including EU partners, may see this as an overreach or violation of established norms. Second, Greenland serves as a geopolitical fulcrum in the Arctic; Russia and China are already pressing presence via resources, shipping lanes, and influence. Third, domestic Greenland sentiment is overwhelmingly against acquisition; economic dependence on Denmark persists, complicating any independence movement. Polls show extremely low support for U.S. ownership.
Several open questions remain. How far will the U.S. administration push—what concessions might Denmark or Greenland accept regarding military bases, resource access, or strategic cooperation short of sovereignty transfer? What do U.S. public and Congressional positions suggest, including bipartisan resistance to military annexation? How will Russia or China respond? And can Denmark balance its support for NATO with defending its territorial integrity in practice? The outcome of the Washington meeting will shape Arctic security architecture and U.S. credibility with allies.
Supporting Notes
- President Trump has pushed for U.S. control of Greenland, calling it essential to prevent Russian or Chinese influence and proposing a new missile-defense system dubbed “Golden Dome.”
- Greenland’s Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen has stated that, “if we have to choose between the United States and Denmark here and now, we choose Denmark. We choose NATO. … We choose the EU.”
- Danish Foreign Minister Lars Løkke Rasmussen has said Greenland is not for sale, criticized U.S. tone, and expressed that any discussions must respect Denmark’s sovereignty.
- The meeting in Washington will include U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance and Secretary of State Marco Rubio hosting Lars Løkke Rasmussen and Vivian Motzfeldt of Denmark and Greenland respectively.
- Greenland is a semiautonomous territory of Denmark with foreign and defense policy managed by Copenhagen; ownershiping or sovereignty transfer is strongly rejected by both Danish and Greenlandic leaders.
- Polls indicate very low support among Greenlanders for U.S. acquisition; also, concerns are raised over preservation of social services and political self-determination under Danish governance.