- About 30–40 pro-Palestinian protesters occupied UW’s Interdisciplinary Engineering Building on May 5, 2025, causing an estimated $1M+ in damage to infrastructure and specialized lab equipment.
- The group targeted UW’s ties to Boeing, which helped fund the building, while UW leaders condemned the occupation as violent, illegal, and antisemitic.
- Police cleared the building the same night and arrested 31 people, and UW suspended and banned participants while referring cases for prosecution on charges including trespassing and property destruction.
- The episode has intensified political and institutional scrutiny of how universities balance protest, campus safety, and corporate partnerships.
Read More
This protest at UW represents a sharply intensified phase in campus activism, where symbolic protests collide with tangible damage to institutions. The scale of the damage—over $1 million to lab equipment, infrastructure, and symbolic Boeing-funded elements—shifts the debate from free speech into allegations of criminal conduct. The fact that Boeing’s $10 million donation is explicitly tied to the building at the center and is also entangled with broader defense contracts implicates not just UW’s funding model but its research and industrial partnerships. This raises reputational, financial, and operational risk.
Institutionally, the swift response—suspensions, bans, and criminal referrals—demonstrates UW’s intent to assert control and discourage similar future occupations. However, legal processes, investigations, and charges remain in flux, and some specialist observers question—based on preliminary information—whether all damage estimates have been fully independently verified. Precedents from other campuses (e.g., Stanford, Columbia) show mixed outcomes regarding arrests, university discipline, and public support. [AP coverage on Stanford shows restitution of ~$329,000 and varying outcomes in student discipline.]
Strategically, universities are increasingly under pressure to navigate activism tied to global political issues—particularly Israel-Gaza—that collide with donor relationships, federal oversight (e.g., Title VI, civil rights), and state-federal political pressures. UW’s case may become a test case: how to manage donor relationships (such as Boeing’s) when constituents see those relationships as morally compromised; how institutions respond to protest when symbolic damage becomes material loss; and how enforcement of student conduct and criminal law scales with protest movements.
Open questions include: Are there cost-sharing or insurance mechanisms UW will use to recoup losses? Will criminal charges be successfully prosecuted, and will students or non-students be held financially liable? What will be the short- and long-term effect on university donation practices and corporate partnerships? How will this affect campus activism norms and administrative policies going forward?
Supporting Notes
- The protest began around 5:00 p.m. on May 5, 2025, when roughly 30–40 people occupied UW’s Interdisciplinary Engineering Building.
- Damage estimates exceed $1 million to building infrastructure, equipment, and interiors, including specialized CNC manufacturing tools.
- Protest tactics included barricading entrances with furniture and e-scooters, gluing doors shut, pulling doors off hinges, defacing a Boeing mural, and setting two dumpsters on fire.
- UW suspended 21 students and permanently banned them from all campuses; non-student protesters were also banned from the Seattle campus.
- Law enforcement actions: UWPD and Seattle PD cleared the building by 11:00 p.m.; 31 arrests made, with charges referred to King County for trespassing, property destruction, disorderly conduct, and conspiracy.
- Boeing donated $10 million toward the IEB (Interdisciplinary Engineering Building) in 2022; the building is valued at ~$102 million; Boeing is a long-time major donor and employer of UW alumni.
- Administrators, including UW President Ana Mari Cauce, condemned the protest as violent, illegal, antisemitic, and unsuitable for peaceful expression of political dissent.
- The protest drew reaction from political figures: Governor Bob Ferguson emphasized accountability; the Trump administration initiated a review; federal bodies cited campus climate and antisemitism concerns.