Silver’s Tightrope: Navigating Risk While Eyes Remain Bullish on Industrial Demand

  • Alexander Campbell, a hedge-fund veteran who was very bullish on silver earlier in 2025, now flags notable short-term downside risks after a roughly 156% year-to-date rally.
  • He highlights near-term pressures from tax-driven selling, a possible U.S. dollar rebound, higher CME margins, overbought technicals, industrial substitution to copper, and index rebalancing that could force selling of about 9% of silver futures open interest.
  • Despite this, Campbell remains structurally bullish on silver due to strong solar and industrial demand, robust ETF buying, and physical market tightness reflected in high spot premiums, backwardation, and China’s new export licensing that may curb supply.
  • He suggests investors manage risk into early 2026 around known event dates but consider using any pullbacks as opportunities to build longer-term silver exposure.
Read More

Alexander Campbell’s recent Substack post represents a nuanced shift: after advocating silver earlier in 2025, he now warns of specific short-term risks while maintaining a bullish long-term outlook. [1] He cites five main near-term risks and potential additional volatility from index rebalancing. [3]

Short-Term Risks: Campbell points to tax-motivated profit taking at year’s end as investors crystallize gains, potentially creating pressure on silver prices after December 31. [1][3] A resurgent U.S. dollar is another key concern, as strong Q3 GDP data could make dollar strength more likely, which typically acts as a headwind for dollar-denominated commodities like silver. [1] The CME’s decision to raise margin requirements for silver futures as of December 29 adds another burden, making leveraged positions more expensive and rendering speculative long positions more vulnerable. [1] Other short-term risks include overbought technical indicators and the possibility that solar and industrial users substitute copper for silver if silver becomes too expensive. [1][3] Lastly, index rebalancing—particularly in the Bloomberg Commodity Index—may force passive funds to reduce exposure, potentially triggering sell orders equal to about 9% of silver’s futures open interest in early January 2026. [3]

Long-Term Positives: Despite near-term softening, the long-term case for silver remains strong. Demand from solar, industrial applications, and investment instruments like ETFs is robust. [1] Compounded by China’s implementation of export licensing from January 1, which threatens to tighten global supply. [1] Also relevant are physical market dynamics: elevated spot premiums in markets such as Dubai and Shanghai, large discrepancies between spot and futures prices, and historic backwardation in London suggest supply constraints and strong demand. [1][3]

Strategic Implications: For investors and corporates, this landscape suggests a two-phase play. In the near term (next few weeks to early 2026), risk management is essential—hedging, avoiding excessive leverage, reducing exposure ahead of known risk dates. But for those able to look past January’s turbulence, accumulating on weakness could offer outsized returns if supply constraints worsen and industrial demand continues its trajectory. Also, stakeholders in industries dependent on silver should evaluate cost-exposure for the coming year, especially solar, electronics, and supply chain operators.

Open Questions: Key uncertainties include whether the U.S. dollar will indeed rebound, or whether expectations for interest rate cuts in 2026 will keep dollar soft. The magnitude of forced selling from Bloomberg Index rebalancing is estimated but not certain. Also unresolved: how severe will the supply constraints from China’s licensing be in practice? Will industrial substitution materially accelerate if silver prices remain elevated? And finally, how will margin changes and regulatory adjustments affect participation and liquidity in silver futures markets?

Supporting Notes
  • Campbell describes silver’s return of ~156% in 2025, with a ~30% gain in December alone. [1]
  • Five near-term risks identified: tax-motivated selling at year-end; dollar rebound; CME margin increase (effective Dec 29); overbought technicals; possibility of copper substituting for silver. [1][3]
  • China’s upcoming export licensing for silver effective January 1 could reduce global supply. [1]
  • Physical premium markets (Dubai, Shanghai) showing elevated prices over futures; strong demand from ETFs; technicals remain bullish in longer horizons. [1]
  • Index rebalancing: passive funds will have to reduce precious metals futures exposure—silver’s position equivalent to ~9% of total open interest expected to decline during Jan 8-14, 2026 roll. [3]
  • CME raised margin requirements on silver futures Jan with heightened volatility making leveraged long positions more expensive. [1]
  • Despite risks, Campbell emphasizes long-term solar demand, which he argues has impractical substitution payback periods for copper (~18 months). [1]

Sources

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search
Filters
Clear All
Quick Links
Scroll to Top