Ranch vs. Farmland Returns: Why Permanent Cropland Is Failing Where Ranch Investments Still Win

  • From 2002–2011, U.S. farmland posted strong, steady returns (NCREIF ~15.4% annualized) alongside roughly 90.6% national cropland value growth.
  • Low farm-sector leverage helped farmland hold up through broader market turmoil, reinforcing its reputation as a resilient real asset.
  • Recent results show more dispersion and stress, highlighted by the NCREIF Total Farmland Index’s first negative year in 2024 (-1.0%) and sharp losses in permanent cropland.
  • Ranch ownership also delivers non-financial value—lifestyle, legacy, privacy, recreation, and tax/conservation incentives—but with liquidity and operating risks.
Read More

The 2011 New York Times article “Owning a Ranch Offers Returns Beyond the Financial” cast ranch ownership as a hybrid asset-class that delivers not only financial returns but emotional, legacy, lifestyle, and non-pecuniary value. It relied on data showing that U.S. cropland values rose about 90.6 % from 2002-2011; that the NCREIF Farmland Index averaged ~15.4 % annually across that period; and that farming sector debt was low, which helped farmland values remain resilient through economic downturns. These data points firmly establish the appeal of ranch/farmland ownership as both financial asset and value-store in that timeframe.

Recent data, however, indicate an inflection point. The NCREIF Total Farmland Index posted its first ever annual negative return (-1.0 %) in 2024, with permanent cropland especially battered by falling capital values even as income returns remain positive. Annual cropland, while still positive in total return, has seen declining capital appreciation and income returns that struggle against rising costs of capital. Thus, the historical tailwinds—appreciation, inflation protection, low volatility—are under new pressure.

Strategically, these trends imply that the “beyond financial” benefits still matter: lifestyle, legacy, privacy, and other non-financial returns may be decisive for high net worth individuals more than pure yield. But pure investment return expectations should be calibrated: recent data show rising risk especially in permanent crop ranches, potential downside for fixed-income returns, and sensitivity to interest rates, commodity pricing, and capital cost. Ranches are less liquid assets, management intensive, and performance varies dramatically by geography, crop type, and whether operations are leased or owner-operated. Institutional investors face a changing risk-return trade-off.

Open questions include:

  • Can the recent negative capital appreciation in permanent cropland reverse, or is this a longer structural shift? What role will rising interest rates and climate change play?
  • How will demand for the lifestyle/non-financial attributes evolve, especially with remote work, demographic shifts, and generational transitions of ranch ownership?
  • What tax, regulatory, and environmental forces (zoning, conservation easements, water rights, carbon credits) will shape net returns?
  • Under what leverage, geographic, crop type, and ownership structures can ranch ownership still deliver returns above other real assets?
Supporting Notes
  • The NCREIF Farmland Index averaged annual returns of ~15.4 % between 2002–2011, with no years of negative total return.
  • Cropland values rose ~90.6 % in the U.S. during 2002–2011.
  • In 2024, the NCREIF Total Farmland Index had a total return of -1.0 %: income +2.5 %, capital -3.5 %. Permanent cropland return was -10.2 % total, with negative capital appreciation being the major drag.
  • Annual cropland’s return in 2024 slipped but remained positive (≈ 5.7 %), while permanent cropland suffered capital losses.
  • In Illinois from 1970–2022, farmland values rose by ~5.7 %/year; cash rents rose ~3.7 %/year. From 2021 to 2022, cash rents increased ≈ 7.0 %; land values ≈ 12.6 %.
  • Ranches offer non-financial returns: lifestyle, privacy, connection to land, legacy and heritage, conservation incentives and tax tools (like easements or exchanges) quoted in recent articles.
  • Recent transactions show high valuations and demand for trophy ranches as heirs sell; e.g. Antlers Ranch 40,000 acres listed for $85 million; Red Hills Ranch 190 acres asking $65 million.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search
Filters
Clear All
Quick Links
Scroll to Top