- Treasury yields edged higher after initial jobless claims fell to 198,000, signaling a resilient labor market and reducing expectations for near-term Fed rate cuts.
- Markets repriced policy easing, with the implied probability of an April cut dropping to about 30% as investors pushed back the timing of the first move.
- A DOJ investigation into Fed Chair Jerome Powell over Fed headquarters renovation testimony fueled concerns that political pressure could erode Fed independence and credibility.
- Analysts and lawmakers warned that perceived weakening of Fed independence could lift inflation risk premiums, pressure the dollar’s standing, and be credit-negative for the U.S.
Read More
The recent sharp decline in initial jobless claims to 198,000—well below expectations—suggests that layoffs remain surprisingly low, providing evidence of resilience in the labor market even as hiring has been sluggish. The upside surprise in claims tightened the economic data that the Federal Reserve is weighing, reducing near-term expectations for rate cuts, particularly the anticipated first cut in April, whose probability now stands near 30%.
At the same time, Treasury yields across key maturities rose modestly as investors incorporated these labor market signals and re-priced expectations for monetary policy. The steepening of the yield curve—short-term rates lower relative to longer-term rates—implies that markets are demanding greater returns for term and inflation risk, especially if central bank policy might tilt toward looser scrutiny or perceived political influence.
Underlying all of this is the DOJ’s investigation into Jerome Powell concerning renovations of the Fed’s headquarters and whether Powell mischaracterized aspects of the effort in congressional testimony. This investigation has triggered concerns within financial markets, among economists, and in Congress about erosion of Federal Reserve independence—a cornerstone of market stability and inflation control. The concern is that political pressure—real or perceived—might encourage premature rate cuts, which could undermine price stability and increase inflation expectations, pushing yields higher especially on the long end.
From a strategic standpoint, these developments may force investors to recalibrate. Low probability of early cuts, potential for policy ambiguity, and geopolitical instability (e.g. U.S.-Greenland dispute, tensions with Iran) add layers of uncertainty. For fixed income, longer-duration positions may see increased volatility; equities sensitive to interest rates and inflation, especially tech and growth sectors, could suffer. Credit spreads may widen if inflation expectations begin to outpace central bank credibility.
Key open questions: Will the Fed respond to political pressure, or maintain data-dependency through Powell’s term ending in May and as Governor through January 2028? How resilient is the labor market if hiring remains weak even while layoffs stay low? What will be the impact on inflation expectations, credit spreads, and U.S. sovereign borrowing costs if Fed independence appears compromised? What role will Congress play, especially Senate Republicans like Thom Tillis, in shaping or resisting Fed appointments? And finally, will markets demand higher risk premiums given this policy uncertainty?
Supporting Notes
- Initial jobless claims for week ending Jan. 10, 2026 came in at ~198,000, below the ~215,000 expected.
- Continuing claims fell, unemployment rate modestly down to ~4.4%, and job growth weak (~50,000 in December).
- 10-year U.S. Treasury yield rose to ~4.156%; 2-year to ~3.55%; 30-year to ~4.794%.
- Probability of a Fed rate cut in April declined to ~30.2% from ~34.6%; markets still expecting two cuts in 2026.
- A criminal investigation (DOJ subpoena) into Jerome Powell centers on alleged misleading testimony about headquarters renovation, cost overruns (~$2.5–4 billion project), with accusations that political pressure is being used to influence interest rate policy.
- Goldman Sachs’ Jan Hatzius warned that the probe has reinforced concerns over Fed independence, though he expects decisions will remain data-driven.
- Fitch Ratings commented that erosion of Fed’s independence would be credit negative due to impact on global confidence in the dollar.
- Sen. Thom Tillis and other Senate Republicans expressed opposition to confirming any Fed chair nominee until investigation resolved; former Fed chairs and Treasury officials issued statements warning of weakening central bank independence.