How Metalmark’s Growth Capital Boosted T. Parker Host’s Port Expansion Strategy

  • Metalmark Capital made a minority growth-capital investment in T. Parker Host in late 2018 alongside Host’s acquisition of the 254-acre Avondale Shipyard in New Orleans, with terms undisclosed.
  • Host kept family control, with CEO Adam Anderson remaining majority owner and other fourth-generation partners staying involved.
  • The funding backed a vertical-integration strategy to build a multimodal bulk and breakbulk terminal network, including planned rail connections via the New Orleans Public Belt.
  • Upside comes from scale and hard-asset capacity, while key risks include capital intensity, execution and permitting, and exposure to shipping-cycle volatility.
Read More

The 2018 strategic investment by Metalmark Capital into T. Parker Host marked a traditional PE growth-capital partnership: Metalmark took a minority stake, enabling Host to pursue large infrastructure acquisition—namely, the Avondale Shipyard—while preserving family control and leadership continuity with Adam Anderson remaining majority owner.

Host’s business had, by then, expanded substantially: about 95 years old, with over 30 locations along the U.S. East and Gulf Coasts, 150 employees five years earlier growing to over 500 by the deal time. Services covered agency, terminal operations, stevedoring, marine assets, and vessel operations. The acquisition of Avondale (254 acres, five docks, over a mile of waterfront) was intended to become a multimodal gateway with planned linkage to six Class I railroads via the New Orleans Public Belt.

Metalmark’s strategic rationale appears tied to its focus on infrastructure & industrial sectors, especially in bulk and breakbulk logistics. The deal fit Host’s aspiration to become an integrated provider rather than just service operator. The Avondale site gives a physical asset base to support supply chain efficiencies amidst rising demand for port-terminal capacity in U.S. import/export trade.

From a risk perspective, the investment involves the challenges typical for infrastructure plays: securing approvals and implementing the promised rail connectivity; deploying sufficient capital for redevelopment; ensuring high utilization of the Avondale facility; exposure to shipping cycles, regulation, environment, and labor. Long payback and capital intensity are material.

Strategic implications for Host include stronger balance sheet access, ability to scale more aggressively; for Metalmark, the deal enhances its portfolio in infrastructure/logistics, a sector with long-term tailwinds (reshoring, supply chain localization). An open question is valuation, governance terms, and whether exit mechanisms (sale, IPO, secondary) were preplanned. Also, whether subsequent acquisitions (e.g. Transmarine) are tied to this investment and how Host’s competitive moat is evolving vs. unionized stevedores, port authorities, and global shipping disruptors.

Supporting Notes
  • T. Parker Host is a maritime provider offering agency services, terminal operations, stevedoring, Jones Act vessel operations, and logistics across the U.S. East and Gulf Coasts.
  • The company had grown from ~150 to over 500 employees over the five years before the 2018 investment and maintained more than 30 locations.
  • Host acquired the Avondale Shipyard from Huntington Ingalls via a partnership with Hilco Real Estate—a 254-acre site with five docks, over one mile of waterfront, and substantial warehousing.
  • Host plans to connect Avondale to six Class I railroads through the New Orleans Public Belt under a Cooperative Endeavor Agreement with the Port of New Orleans.
  • Adam Anderson remained the majority shareholder; fourth-generation family members (Andrew Caplan, Kelsey Host) stayed on as partners despite the PE investment.
  • Metalmark Capital manages ~$3.7 billion in committed capital.
  • The financial terms of Metalmark’s investment into Host were not disclosed.
  • As of mid-2025, Host made additional moves (e.g. acquiring Transmarine Navigation) to expand to all major U.S. ports, suggesting that the 2018 investment may have been leveraged to support a broader growth strategy.

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Search
Filters
Clear All
Quick Links
Scroll to Top