- The U.S. Supreme Court is poised to decide whether Trump’s sweeping IEEPA-based tariffs exceeded presidential authority, after lower courts found them unlawful.
- A strike-down could force $150–$200 billion in importer refunds and cut tariff revenue from roughly $350 billion to about $250 billion, increasing Treasury borrowing needs and upward pressure on yields.
- Stocks and sectors exposed to import costs could benefit if tariffs fall, but markets face elevated volatility from policy uncertainty and potential government workarounds.
- Even if IEEPA authority is limited, the administration is expected to pivot to other tariff tools (e.g., Sections 301/232/122), extending legal and fiscal uncertainty.
Read More
The Supreme Court is on the verge of deciding whether President Trump acted within legal bounds in imposing broad tariffs under IEEPA without congressional approval. Lower courts—including the Court of International Trade and the Federal Circuit—have already ruled that Trump exceeded his statutory authority under IEEPA, citing both separation of powers and the major questions doctrine. Oral arguments in November amplified skepticism among justices across the ideological spectrum, particularly over whether IEEPA’s phrases like “regulate importation” can reasonably power sweeping import taxes.
If the court rules against the administration in Learning Resources v. Trump (consolidated with V.O.S. Selections), importers could see refunds in the range of $150–$200 billion. Government revenue is under threat: current IEEPA-based tariff income totals approximately $350 billion, while a shift to alternative tariff authorities could reduce that to about $250 billion. This decline would worsen the U.S. fiscal outlook and likely increase Treasury issuance and yields.
Financial markets have already begun to price in the uncertainty. Stocks dropped nearly 5% when the tariffs were first announced, although the market rallied significantly in 2025 with over 16% gains, and the Russell 2000 ended 2025 up 11.3% before modest gains in early 2026. Importers in sectors burdened by high import costs stand to benefit if tariffs are overturned; retail, consumer goods, and electronics are frequently mentioned among the potential winners. Small-cap stocks are positioned especially to gain if liquidity from Fed policy combines with tariff relief.
Nonetheless, investors and legal analysts caution that even a ruling against IEEPA authority may have muted practical effects in the long run. The administration is likely to deploy other legal tools—e.g., Section 122 (Trade Act of 1974), Section 301 (Trade Act of 1974), or Section 232 (Trade Expansion Act of 1962)—to re-impose tariffs. Such shifts would perpetuate uncertainty, elevate legal risk for vulnerable companies, and maintain pressure on the fiscal balance sheet.
Strategically, companies should review exposures: importers should prepare for potential refunds and supply-chain benefits; exporters to the U.S. and trading partners affected by reciprocal tariffs should anticipate shifts; fixed-income investors should recalibrate for higher yields. Open questions remain regarding the ruling’s timing, clarity on refund obligations, the mechanics and timing of alternative tariff pathways, and how much of the lost revenue or regulatory authority can be preserved through stacking or replacement legislation.
Supporting Notes
- Supreme Court is preparing rulings (possible as early as Friday) on Trump’s use of IEEPA to impose tariffs without Congress.
- Online prediction markets give only a ~30% chance that the court will uphold the tariffs.
- If struck down, importers expect to receive refunds between $150 billion and $200 billion.
- Government tariff revenue under IEEPA could fall from about $350 billion to $250 billion if these tariffs are ruled illegal and replaced with lower-rate ones via other legal authorities.
- Stocks have rallied ~16% through 2025, Russell 2000 ended 2025 up 11.3% and is “up 4% so far this year” entering 2026.
- In lower courts, including V.O.S. Selections, Inc. v. Trump, judges ruled that the president exceeded his authority under IEEPA and that the major questions doctrine applies.
- Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said monthly customs revenues under IEEPA have reached about $30 billion, roughly four times levels from early 2025.
- J.P. Morgan estimates IEEPA tariffs account for ~61% of the year-to-date increase in U.S. tariffs, or about $180 billion on an annualized basis as of October 2025.