- After January 6, 2021, 200+ companies pledged to pause donations to members of Congress who objected to certifying the 2020 election, but most later resumed giving.
- CREW finds corporate and trade group PACs have sent over $50 million to election-denying lawmakers, plus major sums to GOP committees.
- Popular Information identifies ten firms that have consistently avoided donating to those lawmakers through 2025 and into 2026, including Farmers Insurance, Nike, Whirlpool, Lyft, and Clorox.
- The keep-or-break split is now a reputational and shareholder-governance issue as political giving is scrutinized against stated corporate values.
Read More
Following the violent Capitol attack of January 6, 2021, a large number of companies made public commitments to suspend or suspend political contributions to members of Congress who had voted to overturn the 2020 election results. However, recent investigations indicate that many of these companies reversed course almost immediately, often within months, resuming donations either to those individual lawmakers, leadership PACs, or broader Republican party committees. The financial scale is non-trivial: corporate PACs alone have routed over $50 million to Sedition Caucus members plus further sums to associated party committees.
The problem is not universal. Using recent FEC filings and investigative journalism, at least ten companies including Farmers Insurance, Nike, Whirlpool, Lyft, Clorox, Expedia, Airbnb, Qurate Retail (now QVC Group), Eversource Energy, and Holland & Hart have been identified as having kept their January 6-pledges intact.
This divergence between those that kept their word and those that didn’t has ramifications both reputationally and strategically. In a politicized environment increasingly attentive to corporate values, consistency in political giving (or the lack thereof) is now under scrutiny—not just by watchdogs but by employees, consumers, and shareholders. Moreover, companies that flip-flop face risks of brand damage and investor activism.
Open questions remain: how many companies pledged but never explicitly defined what constitutes “support” (i.e., inequality between giving to individual objectors vs. giving to party committees), how well disclosures allow third-party verification, and whether regulatory or investor pressure will force stricter norms or legislation around political contributions tied to election integrity. Additionally, what these trends imply for political influence: donations resumed not just to individual deniers, but significant streams to NRSC/NRCC and party infrastructure, which potentially magnifies these contributions’ effect.
Supporting Notes
- Crew’s analysis shows over $50.5 million has been given by 1,345 corporate and industry group PACs to Sedition Caucus members’ campaigns and leadership PACs, plus $18.9 million to GOP party committees NRSC and NRCC.
- Specific companies that resumed political donations shortly after their January 6-pledges include Amazon, Walmart, AT&T, Boeing, Comcast, Home Depot, Lockheed Martin, Marathon Petroleum, Pfizer, SpaceX, Union Pacific, UPS, and Valero.
- Popular Information identified ten firms that have never donated to those who voted to overturn the election: Farmers Insurance, Airbnb, Expedia Group, Nike, Clorox, Eversource Energy, Holland & Hart LLP, Qurate Retail (QVC Group), Lyft, and Whirlpool.
- Some companies used legal or semantic defenses to resume giving: Cigna, for example, argued that congressional voting is inherently part of the peaceful transition of power and thus donations did not breach its pledge, which had been limited to those who actively incited violence.
- The gap in implementation and enforcement of political contribution pledges is increasingly a shareholder and governance issue. Firms like AT&T, AbbVie, Amgen, Cigna, FedEx, Home Depot, Pfizer have faced shareholder demands to better align political giving with their democracy-related values.
- In Minnesota, companies such as UnitedHealth, Target, Best Buy, 3M, and Ecolab pledged not to donate to election deniers but “have given hundreds of thousands of dollars” to politicians who voted against certifying the election. Only General Mills has been identified among major Minnesota companies as upholding its promise.